Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 3:12:34 GMT -5
Has described the Master Law of Educational Choice of the Community of Madrid promoted by the Executive of Isabel Díaz-Ayuso as “pure propaganda”. The general secretary of the CCOO Education Federation of Madrid, Isabel Galvín, has said that the new law "is nothing more than another harmful maneuver by the president to establish herself in opposition to the Government of Spain." Not in vain is it known like the 'anti-Celaá law'”, he recalled and regretted that it had been done "behind the backs of the educational community and ignoring the real needs of the Madrid educational system." Unions and the educational community have been warning for months that the new legal text has "a clear propaganda bias", focused on aspects such as the vehicular language in education, which in the opinion of "is not appropriate in Madrid, unless we want to reinforce teaching in the English language"; in addition to providing clear support for centers that separate by sex and the transfer of public land to subsidized education companies.
Likewise, they warned that this law is based on a “false” description of the reality of Madrid, such as that freedom of choice will be guaranteed when there are no school places available in public centers, or that it is a “new” norm. ” when it is largely limited to transcribing the basic state regulations, or talking about the provision of human resources without offering the essential economic memory that concretizes them. They also point “to a regression when trying to revive the LOMCE in Madrid through 'ultra vires' maneuvers, that is, exceeding Australia Phone Number the powers that correspond to an autonomous community, the union leader explained. CCOO has summarized the main arguments why they oppose this law: About “the freedom of families to choose…” - Freedom of education is the main reason for the Master Law, according to the Díaz Ayuso government, even saying it wants to defend article 27.2 of the Constitution. This article only talks about the freedom to found educational establishments and academic freedom. If the freedom of families to choose the school for their sons and daughters were directly enforceable, as is access to education, competitive admission processes would simply not exist.
The great irony is that this freedom of choice that the PP talks about is not, by any means, free. In the commercial game that they claim to defend, where supply and demand operate, the regional government and its partners have dedicated themselves to modifying the supply, reducing places, closing classrooms in public education and promoting concerted education through transfers of land and facilities of all kinds. - Freedom of choice in the Community of Madrid is a mirage. Currently, there are thousands of families who have been left without a place in public schools and have been forced to go to centers that they have not chosen, sometimes with no choice but to go to subsidized centers. About the “right to speak Spanish” - In Madrid there is only one official language and it is, precisely, Spanish. Legislating about realities or controversies that occur in other territories or raising an opposition to the Parliament of Catalonia or another legislative assembly dealing with an issue that has no purpose in the community itself is, truly, a case of unprecedented “regulatory translocation.” - The majority of Madrid educational centers supported by public funds follow the Bilingual Program of the Community of Madrid, which is based on the AICOLE system, which means that the vehicular language is English. Under this regulation, the CM Bilingual Program could be requested to be immediately terminated. About Special Education - It is not possible to understand the need for there to be any community law in this regard.
Likewise, they warned that this law is based on a “false” description of the reality of Madrid, such as that freedom of choice will be guaranteed when there are no school places available in public centers, or that it is a “new” norm. ” when it is largely limited to transcribing the basic state regulations, or talking about the provision of human resources without offering the essential economic memory that concretizes them. They also point “to a regression when trying to revive the LOMCE in Madrid through 'ultra vires' maneuvers, that is, exceeding Australia Phone Number the powers that correspond to an autonomous community, the union leader explained. CCOO has summarized the main arguments why they oppose this law: About “the freedom of families to choose…” - Freedom of education is the main reason for the Master Law, according to the Díaz Ayuso government, even saying it wants to defend article 27.2 of the Constitution. This article only talks about the freedom to found educational establishments and academic freedom. If the freedom of families to choose the school for their sons and daughters were directly enforceable, as is access to education, competitive admission processes would simply not exist.
The great irony is that this freedom of choice that the PP talks about is not, by any means, free. In the commercial game that they claim to defend, where supply and demand operate, the regional government and its partners have dedicated themselves to modifying the supply, reducing places, closing classrooms in public education and promoting concerted education through transfers of land and facilities of all kinds. - Freedom of choice in the Community of Madrid is a mirage. Currently, there are thousands of families who have been left without a place in public schools and have been forced to go to centers that they have not chosen, sometimes with no choice but to go to subsidized centers. About the “right to speak Spanish” - In Madrid there is only one official language and it is, precisely, Spanish. Legislating about realities or controversies that occur in other territories or raising an opposition to the Parliament of Catalonia or another legislative assembly dealing with an issue that has no purpose in the community itself is, truly, a case of unprecedented “regulatory translocation.” - The majority of Madrid educational centers supported by public funds follow the Bilingual Program of the Community of Madrid, which is based on the AICOLE system, which means that the vehicular language is English. Under this regulation, the CM Bilingual Program could be requested to be immediately terminated. About Special Education - It is not possible to understand the need for there to be any community law in this regard.